The following questions, answers, and comments about Classical Adlerian philosophy, theory, and practice have been excerpted from discussion forums, newsgroups, and e-mail correspondence. The text has been edited minimally for clarity and readability. All of this material is protected by copyright and may not be reproduced without the expressed consent of Dr. Stein at htstein@att.net. ![]()
![]() 4. The Dark Side of Human NatureQuestion from Forum: In reviewing our your conversation elsewhere in Behavior OnLine and reading your comments in this Forum, I am struck again and again about what a thoughtful, 'decent' and respectful approach it is. I do wonder though if Adler had anything to say about the darker side of human nature. Most theorists seem to emphasize this. For Freud there's repressed impulses, for Jung there's the shadow. Even contemporary 'schools' touch on this to a degree. Cognitive therapists are concerned with negative self-attributions and constuctivists with dysfunctional narratives. Did Adler have much to say about the darker side?Dr. Stein: Adlerian psychology addresses the complete range of human experience, from optimal to pathological. The ideal of a fully functioning individual, with a highly developed of feeling of community is posited as a benchmark, from which all deviations are evaluated. Adler considered the darker side of human nature as a potential that could develop in individuals if their feeling of community was not sufficiently developed. He saw this darker side, not as an inevitable characteristic of all people, but as a probable reaction to early childhood neglect, abuse, or pampering. These overburdening influences inhibit the development of the feeling of community and frequently lead to mistaken conclusions about oneself and life. In these cases, the generic striving for significance may deteriorate into destructive striving for power over others. However, it is not the original childhood circumstances that "cause" the dark side to emerge in adults -- it is their unchanged, mistaken opinions of themselves and others, as well as their unchanged, unconscious, fictional goals (the choice of wrong directions). Therapeutically, the challenge of Adlerian psychotherapy is not to merely uncover or integrate this dark side but to overcome it mentally, emotionally, and behaviorally. In this respect, Adlerian theory and practice is more optimistic about human nature and therapeutic change than many other approaches. Adler believed that an increase in the feeling of community was the primary key to the prevention and cure of mental illness, addiction, and criminal behavior. (Additional Comments About Inferiority and Aggression) Parental neglect, rejection, or abuse can easily provoke deep, painful feelings of insecurity or worthlessness in children. Many grow up yearning for revenge. However, pampering, overprotection and indulgence can also set the stage for intensified inferiority feelings. Pampered children may "feel humiliated" when they are not the center of attention or given everything they want. Spoiled children can become very aggressive or abusive toward parents if they eventually discontinue their indulgence. Very ambitious, competitive children, who have accomplished or preferred siblings, may feel painfully inferior by comparison, and harbor "dark thoughts" about their rivals. Children, as well as adults, can temporarily mask or relieve their inferiority feelings with high activity, anger, and aggression. They can get "high" on this volatile mixture and often have the illusion of being very powerful. By dominating, hurting, frightening, or exploiting others they indulge in pretenses of victory. Their shallow conquests frequently involve the perverse satisfaction of defeating someone. This "dark side" strategy can become very addictive and result in a progressive indifference to the pain of others.
Question from Forum: Your additional comment like many of your contributions is a wise one and seems animated by a kind of 'radical' environmentalism. When I raised the question of the dark side I neglected to make this consideration explicit. The nature/nurture pendulum nowadays has swung (too far?) toward the nature pole, reflecting developments in biology and perhaps the political sphere. Do you/Adler believe that personality development is solely a function of the environment?Dr. Stein: Personality development is influenced somewhat by the training and challenges of the environment as well as the assets and liabilities of heredity; however, the strongest influence is the creative power of the individual. This premise is reflected in the potential of Classical Adlerian psychotherapy to stimulate a client into choosing a new direction in life (giving up a life style and compensatory fictional goal originally chosen in childhood). In the early 1900's Adler recognized the impact of organ inferiority on the formation of the personality. He even hypothesized an inferiority of the CNS in most cases of schizophrenia. Yet he also pointed out the potential of productive over-compensation in certain organ deficiencies, (i.e. Beethoven's deafness and Demosthenes' stuttering). A negative environment does not always lead to problem children, nor does a positive environment guarantee happy, cooperative children. The decisive factor is what the child makes of his situation when, after trial and error, a choice is made that seems to promise security and significance. Without the critical capacity to foresee later consequences, many errors are possible. In Adler's own words: "It is neither heredity nor environment which determines the individual's relationship to the outside world. Heredity only endows him with certain abilities. Environment only gives him certain impressions. These abilities and impressions, and the manner in which he "experiences" them-- that is to say, the interpretation he makes of these experiences--are the bricks which he uses in his own "creative" way in building up his attitude toward life. It is his individual way of using these bricks--or in other words, it is his attitude toward life--which determines his relationship to the outside world."
At the beginning of Adler's first book, THE NEUROTIC CONSTITUTION, we find one of his favorite aphorisms: "Omina ex opinione suspensa sunt." (Everything is subject to one's opinion of it).
5. Emotions and FeelingsQuestion from Forum: What I am learning about the importance of values and the social responsibility is interesting, though sometimes it seems rather 'heady", what about the heart?The feeling side of the Adlerian approach is very important, but often not sufficiently emphasized in the available literature. The personality ideal of "Gemienshaftsgefuhl" (the feeling of community) is a deep "feeling" of being connected, and embedded in all of life, past, present, and future. It begins with the infant's feeling of being positively connected to the mother, may extend to the father and siblings, and hopefully, develop beyond the family in ever-widening circles. Fundamentally, it is a feeling of being at home on this earth, yet this feeling can grow as wide as the cosmos. By approaching our patients with warm, friendly understanding, we provide the beginning correction for their missing or deficient feeling of connectedness. First, we empathize with their emotional distress, and then gradually help them realize that most of their thoughts, feelings, and actions are consequences of their immediate or future (unconscious) goals. Patients may frequently understand the logic of trying a new direction, but their familiar feelings and emotions do not provide a sufficient spark to move in that unfamiliar direction. At that point, we may try eidetic or guided imagery to promote an emotional breakthrough. Providing corrective "missing experiences" in group therapy may also be effective.
We try to balance our therapeutic interventions so that the head and the heart are equally stimulated.
6. Treatment of CriminalityQuestion from Forum: What is the Adlerian approach to the treatment of criminality?Dr. Stein: I've read the Samenow and Yochelson volumes on "The Criminal Personality," and they've created a compelling view of criminal thinking and feeling patterns, including many concepts that paralleled Adler's theory (energy level, zero state, power thrust, perfectionism). However, there are significant differences, particularly in treatment. Their approach to treatment tends to be nomothetic, systematic, and directive. The Classical Adlerian approach to treatment is more idiographic, creative, and Socratic. We do not have special strategies for depression, anxiety, criminal behavior, or other disorders. Our challenge is to invent a unique therapeutic intervention for each "individual" who may be using symptoms or disruptive behavior in the service of a hidden goal. Initially, using a therapeutic adaptation of the Socratic method, question the client's mistaken thinking. Later on, we may use eidetic and guided imagery to generate conjunctive feelings. If needed, we may use role-playing to practice new, cooperative behavior. However, unless we also uncover and dissolve the hidden fictional goal, the mental, emotional, and behavioral changes may be superficial or temporary. For Adler's thinking about the private logic of criminals, early childhood influences, and treatment recommendations, read "Crime and Related Disorders (Chapter 17) in THE INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGY OF ALFRED ADLER, edited by Heinz and Rowena Ansbacher. Edward Hoffman, in his new biography of Adler, THE DRIVE FOR SELF: ALFRED ADLER AND THE FOUNDING OF INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGY, offers some brief comments. (Quoting Hoffman) "...Adler described most criminals, regardless of socioeconomic background, as dominated by a sense of inferiority and a lack of social feeling. Ultimately, he emphasized, they are cowards with "a cheap superiority complex," overcoming their victims through darkness, surprise, formidable weaponry, or sheer numbers. |